I've tried to understund the conflict in Ukraine. History: <br>
1: 2010 Janukowitj elected in an election described as democratic. <br>
2: Fall 2013, the democratically elected president decide to sign an agreement with Russia instead of with the EU. <br>
3: Sweden and the EU starts to support those who protest against the decision. The protests escalates into a coup d'etat in which the democratically elected president flees to Russia. <br>
4: Russian soldiers starts to invade parts of Ukraine. <br>
For me, the question of democracy central when a president is deposed in a coup. If the president was democratically elected, then the provision should be condemned by all who are in practice for democracy and those who speak out about the country without requiring that the democratically elected President reinstatement is not in practice of democracy. The scandal of this is that no Swedish Parlament party demands that the democratically elected president is reinstated. Thus it seems all Swedish parliamentary parties AGAINST democracy in Ukraine. It is a scandal. <br>
About the Russian invation of Ukraine: Janukowitj has the right to allow Russian troops into his country since he is still the formal president. Russia only violates international law if russian troops do something which Janukowitj has not allowed them to do. All swedish massmedia has the insane propaganda view that the coup against the democraticly elected president is nothing wrong and Russias invation is a violation of international law even though they cannot know that. <br>


<a href="index.html"><align=left>The Personal page</a><br>