Israeli-palestinean peaceplan </br>
</br>
Principles</br>
1: No reward for violence.</br>
2: Reverse all land-theft.</br>
In Europe, this means:</br>
 The European nations wher jews where annahilated during the
 Nazi holocaust should not be "rewarded" with remaining "free of jews"
 if jews wish to move there. For each country where jews where
 annahilated by nazis, the same number of jews that were annahilated
 should be allowed to move to that country and get citizenship of that
 nation. Property which was taken from the annahilated jews should be
 given to the new jews who wish to live there.</br>
</br>
In Israel-controlled territories, this means:</br>
1:All palestineans who have been driven away since 1948 and their descendents,
 should be allowed to return and the land stolen from them should be
 given back to them or their descendents. They should be offered full citizeship
 of whatever nation their land becomes a part of.</br>
2: Israel should evacuate and give back the golan hights to Syria.</br>
3: Inside the borders of what israel control today minus golan hights
 plus gaza and west bank, Israel may choose its border. Israel should only have one
 border, no isolated "islands" . Inside Israel, only one rasist rule may remain: All
jews may go to Israel and live there. Inside and outside of Israel, the palestineans
 who have been driven away and their descendents should be given their land back and
they should be allowed to live where they lived before they were driven away in 1948.
 All jews and palestineans should get full citizinship of whatever nation they end up
 in after the peace. Distribution of water-resources and military service should be
 done without rasism.</br>
Israel would have to choose between a large Israel with a large arab population or a
small Israel with a small arab population. Security will not be an issue since Israel
without landtheft will not upset any neighbouring countries. Wheather the parts of
Israeli-controlled territory which Israel will leave will be a palestinean state or 
become a part of Jordania or Egypt not an important issue.</br>
</br>
A peace which would allow the jews to keep some of their stolen land, will never be
 accepted by the palestineans and is therefore not an option.</br>
</br>
The debate about the Israeli-palestinean conflict is full of easily proven lies which
 have been repeted for decades. Here are some of them.</br>
</br>
1: The jews have historical right to Israel.</br>
The short reply: They stole the land three thousand years ago, lost it two thousand
 years ago, what right does that give them today?</br>
Full reply: They stole the land skightly more then three thousand years ago, and
they lost it slightly less then two thousand years ago, but still: stealing and
loosing something long time ago, doesn't give any rights today.</br>
</br>
2: Israel, unlike it's arab neighbourgs is a democracy.</br>
Fact: Israel, just like most of it's arab neighbourgs is not, has never been, and was never
intended to be a democracy. It is not democracy to forbid the rightful owners of the
 land to vote in elections. Israel refuse the palestinean refugees to vote in Israeli
elections. By any normal moral, the palestinean refugees are the rightful owners of
the land. So Israel is not a democracy.</br>
Israel has however democracy among jews and a few palestineans, which makes it about as
much of a democracy as the apartheid-regime in south-africa was.</br>
</br>
3: After the holocaust, the jews deserve Israel.</br>
Reply: The holocaust does not give the jews the right to take a land away from
a people who had nothing to do with the holocaust. It was the germans, not the
arabs, who slaughtered the jews. The holocaust gives the jews the right to a
land, but they may only take it from a people which has done something so evil
that they deserve to lose their land. The jews had the moral right to take a
part of Germany right after world-war 2, or they have the moral right to take
a part of Serbia today.</br>
</br>
4: The jews need Israel for security.</br>
Reply: Do the bodycount from 1948 until now. I haven't done the bodycount myself,
 but the number of jews killed in the Israeli-arab conflict since 1948 is probobly
 much higher then the number of jews killed in racist crimes in the rest of the
 world during this time. If security was a reason, it would be time for the jews
 to discuss how to end Israel now and thereby increase jewish security.</br>
</br>
5: The jews have religious rights to Israel.</br>
5a: In jewish religion, it is written that jews shall get Israel back.</br>
5b: In the bible, it is written that the jews shall return to Israel.</br>
General reply to 5: The theory of evolution came more than 150 years ago. It was
and still is the total intellectual slaughter of all major religions (jewism,
christianity, islam etcettra). The scientific support for any religion today
is about as strong as the scientific support for Santaclaus.</br>
Reply to 5a: To claim jewish religion in support of todays Isreal may be a double
fault. Not only is it wrong in according to the general reply to motivation #5, but
according to at least some jewish theologists, some of the things that were supposed
 to happen before god would give Israel back to the jews have not happened, so
Israel of today could not be the Israel described in the jewish holy books.
I haven't studied the jewish religion myself, so i don't know if this theological
argument is true, and i don't have any references to the jewish theologists who
made those claims.</br>
Reply to 5b: For those who belive in bible over science: How are you going to make
 the US jews go to Israel? There are more jews in USA then in Israel. Without a
plan about how to make the US-jews go to Israel, the part of the bible which says
"The jews shall return to Israel" will never come true, and thus any christian
support for Israel is wasted, even from a theological point of view. So the
christian support for Israel is really a double-fault.</br>
</br>
So why don't all sides of the conflict jump up and say "O yes, let's have a
 fair peace", like i just described? Because the jews like to keep the land they
have stolen. </br>
</br>
Methods that will lead away from peace are:</br>
Violence, US leadership and any support for Israel.</br>
</br>
Methods which will not bring peace any closer are:</br>
Negotiations, subsidies to arabs/palestineans.</br>
</br>
The only method which may lead to a peace would be US sanity.</br>
US politic towards Israel during the last 60 years is nothing short of
pure insanity. USA is giving subsidies and support to an armed robbery of
land in which most americans have no profit.</br>
A US people based on sanity, would vote for politicians who would make USA
withdraw from the Israeli-arab conflict. This means that USA would give no
military, economical or intelligence support to any side, and no political
support to Israel. If USA allows the rest of the world to deal with Israel
 the way they delt with the apartheid-regime in South-africa, it is possible
 that the jews will search for alternatives to landtheft after only a few years.</br>
</br>
US sanity is very far away. There are about 80 million crazy christians inside USA,
who 150 years after the theory of evolution, still belive in fundamentalistic
 christianity. And yet, 150 years after their theory has been intellectully slaughtered,
the crazy christians elected and re-elected George W Bush. If so many americans has
 managed to stay away from easily proven truths for so long, how can USA change to 
sanity?</br>
In 2008, the people of USA elected a president who was supposed to be a non-fundamentalist unlike George W Bush.
 However, in his campaign, he never criticised Israel. If the conflict is ever going to be resolved, it is nessesary that the people of USA elects a president and a parlament where both president and candidates for parlament declares in there campaigns that if they are elected, they will change the US politic towards Israel to sanity.
</br>
 <A href="http://index.html"><!--img align=center-->Back 
to my personal page </A>